Solar energy discussions today are often dominated by photovoltaic (PV) panels. Falling module prices, massive utility-scale projects, and widespread rooftop adoption have made PV the most visible face of solar power. Yet, solar thermal collectors still make strong economic sense in specific applications, particularly where heat—not electricity—is the primary requirement. Understanding where and why thermal systems outperform PV helps clarify their continued relevance in the energy mix.
To explore in greater depth, check out the Solar Thermal Collectors Market for detailed insights into technology advancements and evolving project requirements.
Different Outputs, Different Economics
The most important distinction between solar thermal and solar PV lies in what they produce. Solar PV converts sunlight into electricity, which can be used directly, stored in batteries, or converted into heat. Solar thermal systems, by contrast, generate heat directly—typically as hot water, steam, or thermal energy for space and process heating.
This difference has important economic implications. Converting electricity into heat using electric boilers, resistance heaters, or heat pumps introduces efficiency losses, additional equipment costs, and greater dependence on grid infrastructure. Solar thermal avoids these conversion steps altogether. Where heat is the primary end use, direct thermal generation is often simpler, more efficient, and more cost-effective over the system’s lifetime.
Supporting this view, a January 2025 study published by Solarthermalworld found that solar thermal systems can be more economical than PV-based heat solutions at moderate process temperatures of around 55–85°C. At typical installation costs of approximately €300 per square meter, solar thermal heat was shown to be cheaper than heat produced using PV systems, particularly at lower temperature levels where direct thermal capture is most efficient.
(Source: Solarthermalworld)
Industrial Process Heat: A Clear Advantage for Thermal
One of the strongest economic cases for solar thermal collectors remains industrial process heat, especially at low and medium temperatures below 400°C. Industries such as food and beverage processing, textiles, chemicals, pulp and paper, and mining require large volumes of heat for washing, drying, pasteurization, and processing.
Using solar PV to meet these needs typically means oversizing PV arrays, adding electrical infrastructure, and installing electric boilers or heat pumps. Solar thermal collectors, on the other hand, can be integrated directly into existing heat loops—often as preheating systems ahead of conventional boilers. This approach reduces fuel consumption immediately, with minimal disruption to operations. For facilities with consistent daytime heat demand, the economics often favor solar thermal due to lower operating costs and faster payback periods.
District Heating: Scale Favors Solar Thermal
Another area where solar thermal continues to make economic sense is district heating. Large, centralized heat networks serving residential blocks, campuses, or entire neighborhoods benefit from the scale and simplicity of thermal generation. Solar thermal collector fields—often combined with seasonal thermal storage—can supply substantial portions of annual heat demand at a predictable cost.
While solar PV can support district heating indirectly through electric heat pumps, this approach increases system complexity and electricity demand. Solar thermal delivers heat directly into the network, reducing strain on power grids and lowering system losses. In regions with established district heating infrastructure, particularly across Europe and parts of Asia, solar thermal remains one of the lowest-cost renewable heat options at scale.
A July 2025 ResearchGate study analyzed a solar district heating system in northern China that combines a large flat-plate collector field (~12,400 m²) with seasonal thermal energy storage (~52,125 m³). The system was able to supply roughly 48,378 GJ of heat annually, with a positive net present value and a defined payback period — demonstrating economic viability when integrated with district heat networks.
(Source: ResearchGate)
Final Takeaway
Solar PV and solar thermal collectors are not direct substitutes—they solve different energy problems. Solar PV clearly leads where electricity demand is the priority or where space constraints limit collector deployment, thanks to its flexibility, ease of installation, and ability to power a wide range of electrical loads. In many modern energy systems, PV is indispensable.
At the same time, solar thermal collectors continue to make strong economic sense wherever heat demand is large, predictable, and central to operations. Industrial facilities, district heating networks, hospitals, universities, and large commercial buildings benefit from direct solar heat that avoids electricity-to-heat conversion losses, reduces fuel consumption, and delivers long-term cost stability. In these settings, solar thermal often achieves faster payback and lower lifetime costs than PV-based heating alternatives.
Rather than competing head-on, solar thermal and solar PV increasingly play complementary roles. Hybrid systems that combine PV for electricity and solar thermal for heat often deliver the best overall economics and decarbonization outcomes. As fuel price volatility persists and pressure to cut emissions intensifies, understanding where solar thermal collectors outperform—and where PV is the better fit—will be critical for decision-makers seeking cost-effective, scalable clean energy solutions.
Contact Us